Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Combating Liberal Bias in Social Science Research

Steven Hayward of Power Line scores again. This time he notes the publication of an article in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (Cambridge University Press) entitled "Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science."

You can download a pdf file of the pre-publication draft. With apologies for the turgid writing style demanded by academic journal editors, here is the abstract.
Abstract: Psychologists have demonstrated the value of diversity—particularly diversity of viewpoints—for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem solving. But one key type of viewpoint diversity is lacking in academic psychology in general and social psychology in particular: political diversity. This article reviews the available evidence and finds support for four claims: 1) Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years; 2) This lack of political diversity can undermine the validity of social psychological science via mechanisms such as the embedding of liberal values into research questions and methods, steering researchers away from important but politically unpalatable research topics, and producing conclusions that mischaracterize liberals and conservatives alike; 3) Increased political diversity would improve social psychological science by reducing the impact of bias mechanisms such as confirmation bias, and by empowering dissenting minorities to improve the quality of the majority’s thinking; and 4) The underrepresentation of non- liberals in social psychology is most likely due to a combination of self-selection, hostile climate, and discrimination. We close with recommendations for increasing political diversity in social psychology. 
As a career social science researcher, I endorse this view.