Finally someone has written what I’ve been thinking about the regime in Iran. Namely, that it is less a nation than the headquarters of a movement which, of necessity, operates a nation about which it isn’t especially sentimental.
In this it resembles the Soviet Union when it was the headquarters of the would-be ‘worldwide’ Communist movement. For now, the reach of the theocratic gang in Iran is less global.
If the US has been talking to the folks who run the country of Iran, trying to reach a deal, the effort has been pointless. An approximate bureaucratic analogy would be talking to the building manager when trying to cut a deal committing the entire corporation.
The real power lies elsewhere, in the mission-driven ideological side of the house. No wonder the supposed president of Iran offered his resignation to the top Ayatollah, he is just a flunky with no power to make decisions or deals for the ideologues in charge.
Many of the IRGC ideologues would, if necessary, offer up Iran as a martyr for the cause. In their minds the cause is so much bigger than simply Iran. The cause encompasses the whole Middle East, for starters, with the world to follow.
The appropriate biological analogy would be cancer. You can’t reason with metastatic cancer. It will not become healthy tissue. Your four choices: ignore it and die, or fight it off until you (a) die of some other cause, (b) kill it or (c) it kills you. Right now the Rx for Iran is more kinetic ‘chemotherapy.’