Thursday, May 10, 2012

Clientelism

Francis Fukuyama is almost always interesting, if not always correct. Here he writes for The American Interest about "the two Europes." What distinguishes the north from the south is, he believes, the prevalence in the latter of clientelism.

Fukuyama defines "clientelism" as follows:
Clientelism occurs when political parties use public resources, and particularly government offices, as a means of rewarding political supporters. Politicians provide not programmatic public policies, but individual benefits like a job in the post office, an intervention on behalf of a relative in trouble with the government, or sometimes an outright payment of money or goods.
Fukuyama then makes a distinction:
Clientelism should be distinguished from corruption proper because of the relationship of reciprocity that exists between politicians and voters. There is a real degree of accountability in a clientelistic system: the politician has to give something back to supporters if he or she is to stay in power, even if that is a purely private benefit.
Whether your ancestors came from northern or southern Europe, or elsewhere, this is an interesting analysis. Upon reflection, I suspect my late father was a beneficiary of clientelism in California in the 1930s.

The other DrC and I observed clientelism very much alive and well on the U.S. dependency of Guam in the mid-1980s. Speaking immediately after his election and making reference to campaign workers, the Governor of Guam was supposed to have said, "Where will I find jobs for all these people?" One result: GovGuam turned school bus driver into a full-time career government job.