Saturday, November 28, 2015

Climate Change: Real But No Emergency

Matt Ridley writes in Scientific American about the question of climate change. Hat tip to RealClearScience for the link.

Ridley strikes a moderate note with which I choose not to argue. I don't believe it to be, at this point, proven fact but it fits the observed data better than other models.
The climate change debate has been polarized into a simple dichotomy. Either global warming is “real, man-made and dangerous,” as Pres. Barack Obama thinks, or it’s a “hoax,” as Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe thinks. But there is a third possibility: that it is real, man-made and not dangerous, at least not for a long time.

This “lukewarm” option has been boosted by recent climate research, and if it is right, current policies may do more harm than good.

If sensitivity is low and climate change continues at the same rate as it has over the past 50 years, then dangerous warming—usually defined as starting at 2 degrees C above preindustrial levels—is about a century away.

We should spend the coming decades stepping up research and development of new energy technologies. Many people may reply that we don’t have time to wait for that to bear fruit, but given the latest lukewarm science of climate change, I think we probably do.
That's a relief. Convince Obama, won't you?