Sunday, September 6, 2009

More Thoughts on Van Jones

If there is anybody awake in the White House this Labor Day weekend, they'll be thinking about what went wrong with their vetting process. If they did this badly on Jones, they're wondering how many other really spooky characters slipped through their screen.

If I were Rahm Emmanuel I'd be starting all over with the vetting process, asking the hard questions and trying to identify the ticking time bombs before others do. Then the iffy people turned up would quietly offer their resignations and slip away into the night before they made trouble for the boss in the Oval Office.

I'd also be asking how the original vetting process went so wrong, and who was responsible for making POTUS look bad. My guess: the problem isn't in the Hoover Building but in the White House.

I suspect the FBI reported issues about candidates and the White House ignored those issues because they believe the FBI to be paranoid McCarthyites. If the White House tries to blame the FBI, I bet the original findings are leaked to the press.

The situation only gets worse for TeamObama.
What the New Media needs to focus on next is this:
who screwed up and who is covering up.

CONTEST
Since Watergate, all big scandals in Washington are called Something-gate. COTTonLINE now announces a contest for the best _____-gate name for this scandal. All good suggestions will appear here and the winner will be identified and get credit, if desired. Submit suggestions as responses to this post, and indicate if you wish your identity known.