John Hinderaker of Power Line posts this chart from the Heritage Foundation comparing the warming predicted by 36 climate models against what actually occurred during the period 1973-2022.
Hinderaker notes the model has attracted the following critique.
If it were simply a matter of mathematical errors or inconsistencies, one would expect some models to err on the “hot side” and others on the “cold side” of actual observations. But that isn’t the case: all of the models run hot. That suggest that global warming alarmism is a political, not a scientific, movement.
Truly ... Chicken Little take note.
